Mastering the
Architecture
of
Innovation
12 Key Findings Best Practices Implementation Value Proposition Our Team Contact Us

Some Very Disconcerting News about Innovation

Technology Companies, Scientists, Engineering Societies, and Educators are worried that there will not be enough scientists and engineers for the predicted growth ahead, according to a Jan 5th, 2006 report in Investors Business Daily. 

From Investor’s Business Daily

U.S. Falling Behind China, India for New Engineering Graduates

Top Students shy away from the hard sciences; tech firms fear impact January 5, 2006  by Laura Mandaro

“Without an adequate and growing supply of computer, math and engineering gradutates, the U.S. will lose its current edge over emerging foreign tech centers as bases for creting new software, breaking ground on new tech innovations, and ultimately, producing more jobs,” stated Ms. Mandaro.

“We face increased global demand for highly skilled scientists and engineers, at a time when American Students seem to be walking away from careers in science and engineering,” said National Science Foundation Director Dr. Arden Bement.

Chinese engineering students comprise 40% of all university graduates: over 20% of the worldwide graduates. In stark contrast, in the U.S. only one graduate in 20  selects engineering at the undergraduate level.  In the brief two year period from 2000 to 2002, freshmen intending to major in computer science fell from 16% to 9.6%. 

Companies like Microsoft, Intel, and Cisco Systems are making major investments in India to secure research and development capabilities. Some are investing in R&D centers, others are investing in small start-up companies. In the recent past, companies went to India and China to secure low cost labor. But they are investing in those companies to retain innovation flows.

        Engineering Degrees (source: Investors Business Daily)

                                                                           No.Bachelor     %of World

        China

        219,563

        21%

        EU-15

        179,929

        17%

        Japan

        104,478

        10%

        Russia

        82,409

        8%

        India

        82,107

        8%

        United States

        59,536

        5%

        South Korea

        56,508

        5%

        Taiwan

        26,587

        3%

        Mexico

        24,184

        2%

        Poland

        21,618

        2%

From USA Today

Cutback in R&D spending raises Red Flag

    By Matt Krantz | Oct 13, 2005

    Are companies squandering the future keeping their shareholders happy?

    While third-quarter corporate profits, being reported now, are expected to soar an additional 15% compared with the year-ago quarter, companies are shoveling much of their fat cash flows back to investors through dividends and share buybacks. In the process, research and development, better known as R&D, is being ignored.

    Companies spent slightly less on R&D as a percentage of revenue in the second quarter than they did a year ago, according to a USA TODAY analysis of Capital IQ data, looking at members of the Standard & Poor's 1500 index. Spending on R&D by companies in the benchmark S&P 500 index has grown 3.3% over the past four quarters, well below the 11.6% growth in revenue during the same period, S&P says.

    Meanwhile, the dollar value of stock buybacks and dividends, two ways to return cash to shareholders, jumped 92% and 13%, respectively, in the second quarter, says Howard Silverblatt, market analyst at S&P.

    The lackluster R&D spending concerns some. Companies "are going to have to increase sales, and to increase sales, they are going to have to increase other things like R&D," Silverblatt says.

    One reason companies are R&D averse: They fear investor retribution. In a reversal from the late 1990s, when dividends were dissed and companies couldn't spend enough on R&D, investors now want executives to return cash to them, says Jim Paulsen, strategist at Wells Capital Management. Investors and executives fear R&D spending is "being thrown down a rat hole," Paulsen says.

    A new study by consultant Booz Allen Hamilton encapsulates these fears. It found that big R&D spenders don't get returns on their outsized investments and that R&D spending has no effect on growth, profitability or shareholder return. R&D is "a roll of the dice of what you will get back," says Barry Jaruzelski, vice president of Booz Allen and co-author of the study that looked at 1,000 companies going back six years.

    But Paulsen says the study's methodology is flawed because it began measuring the effectiveness of R&D spending right when it was peaking and the economy tanked. Tracking the yield of R&D spending back 30 or 40 years would likely have contrary results, he says.

    But while R&D spending has been soft, it's probably not as weak as it appears, says Ron Freedman, CEO of R&D tracker Research Infosource. He says many companies are adding R&D units overseas, so they're getting more research capacity for less money.

    Paulsen thinks companies will resume R&D spending. "Unless (the economic) recovery dies on its own," Paulsen says, "at some point, companies will say maybe this is OK" to spend on R&D.

[Home of Engines of Innovation] [Key Findings] [Finding #1] [Deep Concerns] [Best Practices] [for Supply Chain] [for Alliances] [for OutSourcing] [for Business Dev] [Case Studies] [FAQ] [Consulting Services] [Speakers Bureau] [About Us] [Publications] [Announcements] [Links] [Site Feedback]